Comparison
IP Raccoon vs MaxMind
MaxMind built its reputation on geolocation, with minFraud as a fraud layer on top. IP Raccoon is built the other way around — risk category first, location as a supporting signal.
Side by side
Quick answer
MaxMind's minFraud has no free tier and prices per query across three feature-depth tiers ($0.005–$0.020). IP Raccoon offers 1,000 free lookups and a single flat per-credit rate that drops with volume, regardless of how much detail is returned.
| IP Raccoon | MaxMind (minFraud) | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 1,000 lookups to start, no card required | None — pay-per-query from request one |
| Pricing model | Flat per-credit rate, volume discounts | Tiered by feature depth: Score $0.005, Insights $0.015, Factors $0.020 |
| Core focus | IP risk categorisation, location as a supporting signal | Geolocation (GeoIP2) with fraud scoring layered on |
| Downloadable datasets | Detected Bots, Anonymizers, Reputation, Known Bots | GeoIP2 databases |
| Infrastructure | European infrastructure, GDPR & CCPA compliant | Not specified as EU-based |
Competitor pricing and limits as published on Sep 23, 2026; verify them on the provider’s own pricing page before a purchasing decision, as terms change.
Which one fits you
Choose IP Raccoon if…
- You want to test the product before committing any budget to it
- Your primary need is fraud-risk categorisation, not geolocation accuracy
- A flat, predictable per-credit rate is easier to budget than tiered per-query pricing
- EU-based infrastructure matters for your compliance posture
Choose MaxMind if…
- Geolocation accuracy is your primary requirement, with fraud scoring as a secondary layer
- You need the specific depth of minFraud's Factors tier for an existing risk model
- You're already standardised on GeoIP2 databases elsewhere in your stack
See risk-first IP intelligence in action
1,000 free lookups, no credit card. Compare the category breakdown against what you get today.
FAQ